Charcot Joint

 

 

Charcot Foot APCharcot Foot Lateral

 

Definition

 

Neuropathic arthropathy

- progressive destructive arthropathy 2° to neurological condition

- usually minimal to no trauma

 

Etiology

 

Diabetes

Leprosy / syphilis

Other - polio / paraplegia / syringomyelia

 

Pathophysiology

 

1.  Neuro-traumatic theory - cumulative trauma in insensate foot

 

2.  Neurovascular theory

- neurally stimulated vascular reflex stimulates bone resorption

 

Eichenholtz Classification

 

Stage 0

 

- added by Shibata et al 1990

- clinical signs (swelling/ erythema) precede XRay changes

- NWB during this period may prevent XRay changes

 

  Stage 1 Dissolution Stage 2 Coalescence Stage 3 Reconstruction
Findings

Acute inflammation (swollen, red, warm)

Erythema reduces with elevation 10 minutes

 

Inflammation decreases 

Reduced swelling

Reduced temperature

 

Normal temperature

Swelling reduced

Xray

Demineralisation of regional bone

Periarticular fragmentation

Joint dislocation

Absorption of osseous debris

Organization and early healing of fracture fragments

Periosteal new bone formation

 

Smoothing of edges

Sclerosis, osseous or fibrous ankylosis

Bone healing 

Resolution of osteopenia

 

Management

Total contact cast until stage 2

FWB

CROW (Charcot Resistant Orthotic Walker)

Bivalved AFO

Accommodative shoes with custom moulded orthotic

 

CROW or AFO if ongoing ankle instability

  Total Contact Cast 1 CROW

 

 

Charcot FootCharcot Foot Elevated

 

Charcot Foot Stage 1 FragmentationCharcot Foot Stage 2 ResolutionCharcot Foot Stage 3 Consolidation

  

Natural history

 

30% will relapse between stages

7% risk of BKA without ulcer

28% risk of BKA with ulceration

 

Brodsky Classification

 

Type 1 Midfoot (60%) Type 2 - Hindfoot (30%) Type 3 (10%) 

Metatarsocuneiform and naviculocuneiform

 

Collapse of the medial longitudinal arch with rocker bottom foot

Subtalar joint, talonavicular, calcaneocuboid

 

More unstable than type 1

Require longer periods immobilisation

3a: Tibiotalar joint

- most unstable pattern

 

3b: Fracture calcaneal tubercle

- weak push-off and ulceration

Charcot Midfoot Charcot Hindfoot  

 

Investigation

 

DDx infection

 

MRI

Labelled WCC + Bone Scan

 

Management

 

Goal 

 

Stable plantigrade foot that is shoe-able or braceable

 

Few require operative surgery

- control with casts and braces

 

Indications For Surgery 

 

1.  Severe deformity unable to brace

 

2.  Marked instability (usually type II or IIIa)

 

3.  Ulcers

- common type 1

- aim to try and heal ulcer first

- may be caused by fixed bony deformity i.e. midfoot collapse

 

4.  Soft tissues at risk

 

Contra-Indications

 

Uncontrolled diabetes

PVD

Medically unwell

Stage 1 disease

 

Goals of Operative Management

 

Restore alignment & stability so brace &/or shoe can be worn

- prevent alternative which is amputation

 

Timing of Surgery

 

Operating in stage 1 or 2 remains very controversial

 

Correct deformity in resolution / consolidation stage III 

- after cast / brace, shoe failed

 

Acute Fractures

 

Issue

- is it charcot or non charcot?

 

1.  Likely Charcot

 

Patient

- fracture a week or 2 old / red & swollen

- peripheral neuropathy & displaced fracture

- mimimal trauma

 

Eichenholtz I

- treat non-operatively

 

2.  Non Charcot 

 

Truly acute fracture

- reasonable trauma

- patient has peripheral neuropathy / DM

- treat as per usual, but accept higher complication rate

 

Management

- ORIF early before acute (dissolution) phase sets in

- if delayed be wary of ORIF as bone stock very poor

- need very strong and augmented ORIF

- must warn of risk of Charcot in acute fracture

- with peripheral neuropathy double period of immobilisation

- NWB 3/12 then further 3-4 month in TCC

 

Surgical procedures

 

1.  Midfoot ostectomy

 

Charcot Midfoot CollapseNeuropathic Ulcers from midfoot collapse

 

Midfoot most common site for neuropathic destruction

- mid foot collapse 

- apex of rocker-bottom common site for recurrent ulceration

 

Technique Ostectomy

 

1.  Attempt to heal ulcer first

- TCC

- debridement +/- IV ABs if OM

 

2.  Remove bony prominence causing ulcer

- medial or lateral incision

- avoid areas of ulceration

- full thickness soft tissue dissection to expose exostosis

- remove with osteotome / saw

- smooth edges with rasp

- haemostasis

- closure over drain; compressive dressing

- postoperative TCC for 6/52

 

2.  Hindfoot Realignment & Arthrodesis

 

Indications

- hindfoot Charcot not amenable to bracing 

- severe deformity or instability following failed bracing

- amputation is only alternative

 

Amputation v Arthrodesis

 

May develop bilateral issues

- try to avoid bilateral amputations

 

Contraindications to Arthrodesis

1. Disease Factors

 - Active infection (consider staged)

 - Stage I Eichenholtz

 - Insufficient soft tissue coverage

 - Insufficient bone stock

2. Patient Factors

 - Uncontrolled DM or malnutrition

 - Nonreconstructable PVD 

 - Non-compliant  

 

Technique

 

Preoperative

- cast / TCC till Stage III

- optimise HBA1c and nutrition

 

Intraoperative

- longitudinal incisions with full thickness flaps under no tension

- meticulous soft tissue handling

- resect bone to correct deformity

- strongest fixation device possible ; often augmented

- if using hindfoot nail ensure >200mm length

(risk of tibial stress fractures with shorter nail)

- often need percutaneous T Achilles lengthening

- alternative: fine wire fixation if active infection

 

Postoperative

- TCC - 3/12 NWB ; 1/12 PWB; 1/12 WBAT

- Lifelong AFO

- Periodic 6/12 follow-up

 

Results

- Lowery FAI 2012 - 76% bony fusion; 22% fibrous ; 1.2% amputation

- fibrous union can still result in good function